My Pacific Northwest
Home Currently Tadpoles Pictures Stuff
   Page Path:   Home / Stuff / SciTech / MoonHoax / Hoax.Backlighting.aspx  
Backlighting?
The 'official' line raises more questions than it answers
< Back to Home
                 
Consider this picture...

Its from Apollo 16, and has been marked up to show the different shadowing effects... 

The lunar surface is a fairly bright gray color. It is known, from the Apollo samples brought back and analyzed in Houston, to contain a LOT of glass beads, with a lot of reflective and refractive minerals in it. All of these materials tend to kick light directly back toward the source of illumination with very high efficiency, in this case the sun. This is one reason why the Full Moon is so much brighter (than other phases) in the night sky; the sun is "behind" the Earth. The effect of the sunlight hitting the lunar surface and being reflected back toward the sun itself creates a "backscatter" that fills in the astronaut's bright white shadowed suit with excellent "fill-light."  Almost no light at all has seeped into the shadow -- because it's lying flat on the ground and cannot "see" anything but black space overhead!

That's the word from the home office, anyway... but... There's a rock to the of the image - and seemingly closer to the astronaut taking the picture - that DOES NOT get any light reflected backwards... nor does any other  shadow-facing object... and the shadow is JET BLACK - nothing reflects back AT ALL from within the shadow... nothing.  It doesn't make sense to me that the astronaut can gain from light reflected from the surface, but nothing else can...

Granted, this isn't the strongest of arguments... but with every thing else, you start wondering... well, at least I do.
 

             

Added in 2007

< Back to Home

           
Part of MY website                This site is primarily intended to be a means to keep my family up to date... if you have a question or comment, EMAIL ME